So you would give up a keeper for a player that you wouldn't keep on a prayer that Matthews will prove himself keep-able in the next 8 weeks despite showing absolutely nothing to lead you to believe he will?
I will admit AJ is the better prospect for the rest of the season but is he that much better? I say no.
standard positions (qb, 2 rb, 2 wr, 1 flex, te) - right now pending bye weeks I go like this
Flacco
MJD
McCoy
Hillis
Marshall
Percy Harvin
Keller
bench:
Orton
Matthews
Felix Jones
Pierre Garcon
Johnny Knox
Winslow
I'm just worried about the rest of this season at RB to play 3 each week.
So you would get to pair AJ with Marshall but then you would have to run a 3WR @ flex. I personally would rather run a 3rd RB and Matthews and Jones aren't dependable enough for my tastes. You do have a sleeper in Garcon though who will probably be huge with all of the injuries the Colts are having. Eh, I don't know that the deal would be a huge step forward but it won't be a step back.
I still don't like getting Johnson with the intent of keeping Matthews or anyone on that roster over him.
I don't think I'd make the trade knowing you have the flex position. I think your better running with the 3 RB's.
Originally Posted by Mike Illitch
Bookmarks