That assumes you know what GZ did and you don't. More of the same from you assuming that a criminal who was packing and should not have been, had good intentions.
You can't get it through your thick skull that GZ initiated it. Why not? He was in control of whether to let the guy go on about his business or initiate some interaction. He choose to initiate an interaction....PERIOD. The result of GZ profiling TM was him negligently killing him.
F the NRA
He didn't "stalk" him. He followed him. If every citizen would take on the same level of personal responsibility, we wouldn't have half the societal problems we have. We wouldn't have Rev. Marvin Winans getting car jacked in his own town. We wouldn't have people standing on street corners in open sight dealing drugs.
This whole "I'll let the government take car of it" is basically everything wrong with society today.
Police are not people's individual body guards. Their existence does not abdicate a citizen from exercising their rights.
"Number 43 added Four Trillion Dollars by his lonesome. That's irresponsible. Its unpatriotic." Barack Obama
I never realized so many people were vehemently against neighborhood watch.
Mom, whatever. Either way SHE said it, so in the Jury's mind that's a done deal that it was GZ yelling. Experts have basically said they dont know, the mom says it was not TM, combine it with the physical damage done to GZ and that's most likely case closed in the court's mind.
Bookmarks