In the NBC segment, Zimmerman says:“This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.”
The full version, though, unfolds like this:So Zimmerman is a racist, right? Uh, not quite.
wow.
Zimmerman: “This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.”
911 operator: “Okay. And this guy, is he white black or Hispanic?”
Zimmerman: “He looks black.”
4/26/2012
Man, you're probably right, but I would say you could apply your statement to this whole board--me included--not just TRRW.
FWIW, I think we all see situations like this, where there's MUCH open to interpretation, from our own preconceived POVs before we do anything else. '
In other words, we all "profile" whether that's racial, economically, etc.
I obviously have no idea what happened that night. But when I heard the information that I did, as it was initially presented, I took my own notions and past experience of guys who try to play tough guy/overstep their authority. So that's probably one of the reasons I see Zimmy being way on the wrong side of this one. I don't think many here have said what they thought was "Fact." Perhaps the conviction in which they stated it comes across that way.
MotorCityJoe- Since 2007: You talking to me?
Member #6583
shocking, the media changes the story to fit it's own agenda...i guess they didn't change anything, they just omitted some words from the 911 call...
the above item is why my other thread was started...the media is full of **** and do nothing but do what helps whatever agenda they think will bring them ratings...a$$holes
Clearly the law is not as cut and dry as it could be. That said, this is exactly why this matter should have been handled in a court of law. TM can't speak for himself, so therefore they took GZ word, but the story doesn't add up. Using the defense of the stand your ground law works both ways in my opinion. On the surface GZ initiated this whole thing and used a 9mm against a can of iced tea in whatever altercation took place.
F the NRA
Just an FYI-from the Florida Statute:
Zimmerman has to prove that he was attacked by Trayvon first in order to justify the use of force.(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
And here is what is wrong with your statement. Had people said, "I don't know what happened, I'll pass on voicing an opinion." This case would have been buried. Clearly that would have been a travesty. Instead, I am glad someone said, "this doesn't seem to be right and no one is offering answers to justify killing a person who had every right to be where he was at." The notion that people should not debate this is comical. Everyone has the right to their opinion and to offer it if they so choose.
Since you want to refrain from commenting I am wondering why you came in this thread anyway.
My preference is to continue to look at the information that is available, analyze it and comment on it if I feel like it. Thankfully millions of others are doing that as well as protesting until the unanswered questions get answered, and most importantly so that people that should be held accountable are not let off the hook.
F the NRA
If a stranger is following you and you don't know his motives, indeed if an altercation ensues you should be fighting for your life.
I teach my self defense students all the time when you engage, you engage with the understanding you are fighting for your life. I would tell my son and daughters to do the same if they are followed by a stranger particularly in an area without witnesses.
F the NRA
Bookmarks