because it depends on wtf happened when GZ and TM met up..and none of us know what happened. going up to someone and asking what they are doing around here isn't illegal last I looked nor is it inherently irresponsible. now if he just went up to him and shot him for no reason thats one thing...if GZ asked TM what he was doing around here and then TM immediately attacked GZ...that changes the entire story. and with differing witness accounts and contradictory "facts" flying around...i'm not sure how you or anyone else can unequivocally make that determination.
Last edited by MoOff24; 04-01-2012 at 05:18 PM.
4/26/2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...g.html?hpid=z6
manipulation.
dont know if this has been posted.
http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigati...l%20Report.pdf
4/26/2012
This really comes down to the following:
1. Some people are going to take GZ word that Trayvon attacked him and base their sole view on that uncorroborated point.
2. Some feel that GZ should be held accountable for killing Trayvon and should have been arrested because for without his ill-advised actions, he would not have put himself in such a position to kill a kid who had every right to be where he was at.
I am in camp #2.
Last edited by The_Real_Right_Way; 04-01-2012 at 08:32 PM.
F the NRA
Bookmarks